No, thank you: I have a type three secretory system.
-- http://desertphile.org Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
On 7 Jul, 00:51, Desertphile <desertph...@invalid-address.net> wrote:
> No, thank you: I have a type three secretory system.
That was question 3 btw.
Seems you got your orderin all mixed up. Then again, so many theories, so few proteins.
Tell me does your "secretory system" penetrate the outer layer? Because that really fucks things up.
You see you got all these engines wizzin, wastin atp energy, with no propellant. Or you got a wiggly tail, with no motor capacity. Or... Or...Or...Or
So whats "your" view?
Hint at question 4), When you "associate" (God that's so subtle) your first protein with your next. Dont you at the same time need Other proteins to put them in place?
>> No, thank you: I have a type three secretory system.
>That was question 3 btw.
Was it? We would never have known.
>Seems you got your orderin all mixed up. Then again, so many theories, >so few proteins.
And, in your case, so few working brain cells.
>Tell me does your "secretory system" penetrate the outer layer?
It would have to, otherwise it would not be a secretory system you moron.
>Because that really fucks things up.
For you, sure - all science does that.
>You see you got all these engines wizzin, wastin atp energy, with no >propellant. Or you got a wiggly tail, with no motor capacity. Or... >Or...Or...Or
>So whats "your" view?
That you are a complete idiot.
>Hint at question 4), When you "associate" (God that's so subtle) your >first protein with your next. Dont you at the same time need Other >proteins to put them in place?
>Little buggers dont just jump in on que you know.
> > No, thank you: I have a type three secretory system.
> That was question 3 btw.
> Seems you got your orderin all mixed up. Then again, so many theories, > so few proteins.
> Tell me does your "secretory system" penetrate the outer layer? > Because that really fucks things up.
> You see you got all these engines wizzin, wastin atp energy, with no > propellant. Or you got a wiggly tail, with no motor capacity. Or... > Or...Or...Or
> So whats "your" view?
> Hint at question 4), When you "associate" (God that's so subtle) your > first protein with your next. Dont you at the same time need Other > proteins to put them in place?
> Little buggers dont just jump in on que you know.
* I think you mean "on cue". Or are you speaking Spanish?
