I extend the same offer to Harshman of 7 months ago. If either he or one of his merry band of atheists produce a particularly good rebuttal to one of "my" posts that he thinks demands my response I will do so if, and only if, Harshman points it out.
Since I don't have time to read all the responses he need only begin a new thread with my name in the subject line to get my attention and point out the outstanding post in the body (or link to it). In return I will endeavor to respond or concede if I cannot.
The last time I gave this offer Harshman got so flustered that he highlighted a post of his own that was so filled with obvious errors that I was forced to grant him 6 months of Mercy Rule protection.
Assuming that Harshman isn't terrified let the games begin...
> I extend the same offer to Harshman of 7 months ago. If either he or > one of his merry band of atheists produce a particularly good rebuttal > to one of "my" posts that he thinks demands my response I will do so > if, and only if, Harshman points it out.
> Since I don't have time to read all the responses he need only begin a > new thread with my name in the subject line to get my attention and > point out the outstanding post in the body (or link to it). In return > I will endeavor to respond or concede if I cannot.
> The last time I gave this offer Harshman got so flustered that he > highlighted a post of his own that was so filled with obvious errors > that I was forced to grant him 6 months of Mercy Rule protection.
> Assuming that Harshman isn't terrified let the games begin...
> Regards, > T Pagano
The only one who should be terrified is you when you meet your God.
> I extend the same offer to Harshman of 7 months ago. If either he or > one of his merry band of atheists produce a particularly good rebuttal > to one of "my" posts that he thinks demands my response I will do so > if, and only if, Harshman points it out.
> Since I don't have time to read all the responses he need only begin a > new thread with my name in the subject line to get my attention and > point out the outstanding post in the body (or link to it). In return > I will endeavor to respond or concede if I cannot.
> The last time I gave this offer Harshman got so flustered that he > highlighted a post of his own that was so filled with obvious errors > that I was forced to grant him 6 months of Mercy Rule protection.
> Assuming that Harshman isn't terrified let the games begin...
> Regards, > T Pagano
Did you have a point to make along with this courageous challenge?
> On Jul 5, 9:34 am, T Pagano <not.va...@address.net> wrote:
> > I extend the same offer to Harshman of 7 months ago. If either he or > > one of his merry band of atheists produce a particularly good rebuttal > > to one of "my" posts that he thinks demands my response I will do so > > if, and only if, Harshman points it out.
> > Since I don't have time to read all the responses he need only begin a > > new thread with my name in the subject line to get my attention and > > point out the outstanding post in the body (or link to it). In return > > I will endeavor to respond or concede if I cannot.
> > The last time I gave this offer Harshman got so flustered that he > > highlighted a post of his own that was so filled with obvious errors > > that I was forced to grant him 6 months of Mercy Rule protection.
> > Assuming that Harshman isn't terrified let the games begin...
> > Regards, > > T Pagano
> The only one who should be terrified is you when you meet your God.
> RAM- Hide quoted text -
> - Show quoted text -
Pagano, Nashton, Nando. Seems like old times. Maybe Ed Conrad will come back too.
> On Jul 5, 10:34 am, T Pagano <not.va...@address.net> wrote:
> > I extend the same offer to Harshman of 7 months ago. If either he or > > one of his merry band of atheists produce a particularly good rebuttal > > to one of "my" posts that he thinks demands my response I will do so > > if, and only if, Harshman points it out.
> > Since I don't have time to read all the responses he need only begin a > > new thread with my name in the subject line to get my attention and > > point out the outstanding post in the body (or link to it). In return > > I will endeavor to respond or concede if I cannot.
> > The last time I gave this offer Harshman got so flustered that he > > highlighted a post of his own that was so filled with obvious errors > > that I was forced to grant him 6 months of Mercy Rule protection.
> > Assuming that Harshman isn't terrified let the games begin...
> > Regards, > > T Pagano
> Did you have a point to make along with this courageous challenge?
Why yes. Instead of declaring victory and running away for months *after* he loses an argument, he's now declaring victory and running away before an argument is started.
Prudent choice.
KP
I do not approve of anything that tampers with natural ignorance. Ignorance is like a delicate exotic fruit; touch it, and the bloom is gone.
RAM <RAMather...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 5, 9:34 am, T Pagano <not.va...@address.net> wrote: > > I extend the same offer to Harshman of 7 months ago. If either he or > > one of his merry band of atheists produce a particularly good rebuttal > > to one of "my" posts that he thinks demands my response I will do so > > if, and only if, Harshman points it out.
> > Since I don't have time to read all the responses he need only begin a > > new thread with my name in the subject line to get my attention and > > point out the outstanding post in the body (or link to it). In return > > I will endeavor to respond or concede if I cannot.
> > The last time I gave this offer Harshman got so flustered that he > > highlighted a post of his own that was so filled with obvious errors > > that I was forced to grant him 6 months of Mercy Rule protection.
> > Assuming that Harshman isn't terrified let the games begin...
> > Regards, > > T Pagano
> The only one who should be terrified is you when you meet your God.
> On Jul 5, 10:50 am, RAM <RAMather...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Jul 5, 9:34 am, T Pagano <not.va...@address.net> wrote:
> > > I extend the same offer to Harshman of 7 months ago. If either he or > > > one of his merry band of atheists produce a particularly good rebuttal > > > to one of "my" posts that he thinks demands my response I will do so > > > if, and only if, Harshman points it out.
> > > Since I don't have time to read all the responses he need only begin a > > > new thread with my name in the subject line to get my attention and > > > point out the outstanding post in the body (or link to it). In return > > > I will endeavor to respond or concede if I cannot.
> > > The last time I gave this offer Harshman got so flustered that he > > > highlighted a post of his own that was so filled with obvious errors > > > that I was forced to grant him 6 months of Mercy Rule protection.
> > > Assuming that Harshman isn't terrified let the games begin...
> > > Regards, > > > T Pagano
> > The only one who should be terrified is you when you meet your God.
> > RAM- Hide quoted text -
> > - Show quoted text -
> Pagano, Nashton, Nando. Seems like old times. Maybe Ed Conrad will > come back too.
* Conrad realized that his misinformation was based on a typo:
>> On Jul 5, 9:34 am, T Pagano <not.va...@address.net> wrote: >> > I extend the same offer to Harshman of 7 months ago. If either he or >> > one of his merry band of atheists produce a particularly good rebuttal >> > to one of "my" posts that he thinks demands my response I will do so >> > if, and only if, Harshman points it out.
>> > Since I don't have time to read all the responses he need only begin a >> > new thread with my name in the subject line to get my attention and >> > point out the outstanding post in the body (or link to it). In return >> > I will endeavor to respond or concede if I cannot.
>> > The last time I gave this offer Harshman got so flustered that he >> > highlighted a post of his own that was so filled with obvious errors >> > that I was forced to grant him 6 months of Mercy Rule protection.
>> > Assuming that Harshman isn't terrified let the games begin...
>> > Regards, >> > T Pagano
>> The only one who should be terrified is you when you meet your God.
> In article > <a259105e-2dc1-4613-9636-fb2678e9f...@b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
> RAM <RAMather...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Jul 5, 9:34 am, T Pagano <not.va...@address.net> wrote: > > > I extend the same offer to Harshman of 7 months ago. If either he or > > > one of his merry band of atheists produce a particularly good rebuttal > > > to one of "my" posts that he thinks demands my response I will do so > > > if, and only if, Harshman points it out.
> > > Since I don't have time to read all the responses he need only begin a > > > new thread with my name in the subject line to get my attention and > > > point out the outstanding post in the body (or link to it). In return > > > I will endeavor to respond or concede if I cannot.
> > > The last time I gave this offer Harshman got so flustered that he > > > highlighted a post of his own that was so filled with obvious errors > > > that I was forced to grant him 6 months of Mercy Rule protection.
> > > Assuming that Harshman isn't terrified let the games begin...
> > > Regards, > > > T Pagano
> > The only one who should be terrified is you when you meet your God.
> > RAM
> * > As Bush says: "Bring 'em on!!"
Does Pagano have a "Mission Accomplished" banner behind him as he posts this thread?
